AJ Dybantsa and the Importance of Playing Without the Ball

AJ Dybantsa is the consensus No. 1 player in the 2026 NBA Draft, and it's easy to see why he's such a highly regarded prospect. At just 19 years old, he's already an elite scorer and shot creator, coming off a historically good season at BYU, where he was one of the best players in college basketball.

But what if he's more of a boom or bust prospect than everyone realizes?

His best traits are elite, but when you look under the hood, there are some serious red flags, mostly regarding what he does when the ball isn't in his hands and the impact he provides on defense. Today, we'll examine what makes Dybantsa a historic offensive creator for a wing and why his lack of production as a rebounder and defender could limit his impact in the NBA.

Subscribe

---

Unstoppable Interior Scorer

This past season, AJ Dybantsa was one of the best offensive players in the nation. A big reason why is that he was arguably the best scorer in the nation, averaging 26 points per game on 60% true shooting. This is historic scoring output for someone this young, as only Michael Beasley and Bernard King have ever matched this level of scoring volume and efficiency as a freshman.

Dybantsa is extremely gifted as a scorer and offers considerable versatility in this area. He specifically excels as an interior scorer, as his rim finishing and mid-range shooting are both historically good for a wing.

Let's start by examining his rim finishing. Dybantsa is a big wing with excellent physical tools (6'9, 42-inch vertical, etc.), and he utilizes them to get to the basket often and play above the rim consistently. His elite explosion allowed him to record 43 dunks this season.

He also has a good touch around the rim, and this is really important. Just because a player generates a lot of dunks doesn't mean that they are good finishers. Dybantsa constantly creates easy rim attempts off the dribble, and he can adjust his body to hit tough layups. This is why he shot 72.3% on close twos this season.

That combination of above-the-rim athleticism and touch around the basket makes him a lethal driver, and he averaged 1.17 points per possession (93.8th percentile) on rim attacks from the perimeter this year.

One of Dybantsa's more underrated traits is his ability to get to the free-throw line. He is a physical offensive player, which allows him to draw a lot of fouls. This is why he averaged nine free throws per game and had a free-throw rate of 0.490 this season. Getting to the free-throw line is a valuable skill because free throws are free shots. It doesn't get much easier to score than shooting free throws!

Dybantsa's effectiveness as a driver is even more impressive when you consider that he created the vast majority of his rim attempts. In fact, 79.7% of his rim attempts were unassisted! He didn't just feast off of handoffs or cuts, leaning on his teammates to set him up for success. He did the dirty work himself.

His ability to attack the rim in the halfcourt is unbelievable, and what I find really cool is that it translates to the open court. For example, he averaged 1.46 points per possession (89.8th percentile) in transition this year, so he's a lethal threat to score at the basket all the time. As a defense, you have to be on high alert whenever Dybantsa is on the court because his presence at the rim is so strong.

In addition to being an elite rim finisher, Dybantsa is an incredible mid-range shooter, making him nearly unstoppable as a scorer. This year, he shot 46.3% on long twos on 272 total attempts. There aren't many wings who have ever matched this level of mid-range scoring in the history of college basketball. No wing this young has ever done it, putting Dybantsa in pretty rare territory in this area.

And just like he generates a lot of his rim attempts off the dribble, he also generates a lot of his mid-range jumpers off the dribble. 88.1% of his mid-range shots were unassisted this season. This level of self-creation is wildly impressive.

Below is a chart showing how AJ Dybantsa stacks up historically as a rim finisher and mid-range shooter among players with at least 350 total two-point attempts in a single college basketball season. The X-axis shows each player's rim FG%, and the Y-axis shows each player's mid-range FG%. Dybantsa is in the top-right quadrant, indicating he's a historically good interior scorer.

I think it's also a great sign that BYU was much better scoring inside the three-point line when Dybantsa was on the floor this season. When he wasn't on the floor, BYU shot just 56.4% at the rim and had a free-throw rate of just 0.276. When he was on the floor, BYU shot 68% at the rim and had a free-throw rate of 0.352.

Dybantsa is a great interior scorer himself, but he also elevates his team's inside scoring. This might be one of the best interior scoring wing prospects in recent memory.

Wing Playmaking

Everyone knows that Dybantsa is an elite scorer, but I don't think many people view him as a strong playmaker. However, I think he's a talented passer for a 6'9 wing, and I think there's evidence that he could develop a lot in this area.

This season, he averaged 3.7 assists per game, and he was one of BYU's most productive passers, ranking second on the team in total assists behind Robert Wright III. I think his passing production was pretty impressive, considering the role he played on his team.

For example, Robert Wright III led the team in assists with 162 in total. Dybantsa was second with 130. This isn't a huge difference, but their offensive roles definitely were. When we consider the difference in their roles, the way we view their playmaking output changes completely.

Dybantsa was the number one scoring option on the team, leading the Cougars in both usage rate and total field goal attempts. He had a usage rate of 33.9% and 604 total field-goal attempts. No one else on the team was close to him in these two metrics, though Wright was second in both, with a usage rate of 25.2% and 488 total field goal attempts.

The fact that Dybantsa was fairly close to Wright in total assists despite carrying a significantly larger offensive load and doing much more as a scorer makes his playmaking output more impressive than it looks on the surface.

I also think his playmaking efficiency is quite good for a wing. This year, he had an assist rate of 22.1% and an A/TO of 1.2, meaning he assisted on a decent number of his teammates' field goals, and he did a solid job of limiting turnovers relative to how often he generated assists. These aren't elite marks in general, but they are fairly impressive for wings of comparable size and usage to Dybantsa.

Below is a chart showing a few high-major players who are between 6'8-6'10 and had a USG% of 30%, an AST% of 20%, and an A/TO of 1.0 throughout their college careers.

Admittedly, Dybantsa is one of the least productive playmakers here, as he falls well short of star wing creators like Cooper Flagg and Cameron Boozer. However, I think this query shows that Dybantsa's playmaking production, while not elite, is good given his usage, size, and age.

Now, it is fair to critique his passing ability because he doesn't pass the ball all that often. According to Hoop Explorer, he doesn't drive and kick the ball out to shooters or operate as a PnR passer all that often. Scoring actions and transition plays make up a vast majority of his possessions.

AJ Dybantsa's Playtype Data via Hoop Explorer

However, he generates extremely efficient offense when he does operate as a passer. Below is the number of points he generates per possession on different passing play types.

Drive and Kick: 1.12 PPP (93.8th percentile)

PnR Passer: 1.17 PPP (91.7th percentile)

Inside Out (Plays in which a frontcourt player is doubled, and he passes the ball to an open shooter): 1.09 PPP (93.4th percentile)

I would argue that Dybantsa has the potential to be a good playmaking wing at the next level. His playmaking numbers are pretty good across the board, and his tape includes several plays in which he makes advanced skip passes and utilizes his gravity to generate easy shots for his teammates. I'd be interested to see if he can ever increase his playmaking usage and keep his efficiency the same.

Shot Diet, Rebounding, and Defense

AJ Dybansta's offensive profile is excellent, but he is not a perfect prospect. He has real flaws concerning his shot diet, rebound, and defense.

Let's start by evaluating his shot diet, or where he chooses to shoot his shots. Unfortunately, although he was a dominant scorer in college, he has an unoptimized shot diet that could cap his scoring ability and, more specifically, his scoring efficiency at the next level.

The reason his shot diet isn't optimized is that he takes too many mid-range jumpers and has pretty low three-point volume. This season, he shot 184 close twos, 272 far twos, and averaged 6.9 three-point attempts per 100 possessions. This shows he relies heavily on mid-range jumpers, which are less efficient than rim attempts and threes.

Thankfully, he's an amazing mid-range shooter, so this hasn't caused any problems for him so far. However, that could change quickly when he's playing against the best athletes and the best defenses the sport has to offer. Smart teams will force him to take unoptimal shots, and they will try to get him to live on a diet of tough long twos. I worry that he might be ok with this.

Below is a chart showing AJ Dybantsa's scoring tendencies compared to those of two other college basketball wings with similar shot diets while in school. This includes Georges Niang and Harrison Barnes.

All three of these players took more mid-range jumpers than rim attempts and averaged less than 7.0 3PA/100. Niang and Barnes both had long NBA careers, but neither became an all-star, which would obviously be a disappointing outcome for a prospect like Dybantsa. What worries me even more than this is that I couldn't find many wings with this type of shot diet in the history of college basketball who went on to become highly impactful offensive players in the NBA.

Of course, this is just one part of the game. However, it's really important. For a guy whose main draw is his scoring ability, this is a big problem.

The issues don't stop there, though.

Outside of scoring and playmaking, I think Dybantsa bleeds a lot of value, and that is a significant problem. He simply doesn't impact the game much as a rebounder or defender, and his freshman production in these areas was underwhelming for a wing, especially one with Dybantsa's physical tools.

This season, he had an offensive rebound rate of 4.7% and a defensive rebound rate of 16.9%. That offensive rebound rate is pretty low for a wing, and that defensive rebound rate is a bit underwhelming. Rebounding isn't the most important thing for a wing to do, but this stat can be a reflection of how a player utilizes their athleticism in practical ways to impact the game. Dybantsa simply doesn't use his physical tools to end possessions by crashing the glass.

Unfortunately, he also isn't very active on defense, as reflected by his low steal and block rates. This season, he had a steal rate of 1.7% and a block rate of 1.1%. Combine these metrics, and you get a stock rate of 2.8%, which is disgustingly low for a wing that's likely going to be the No. 1 pick.

His defensive playmaking is historically bad for college basketball standards. Below is a chart showing his steal and block rates historically among players of similar size.

Historically speaking, Dybantsa's steal rate is below average but not quite awful. However, his block rate is shockingly bad for his size. I don't understand how he blocked so few shots this year.

I want to make it clear that I don't view Dybantsa as a bad defensive prospect because his steal and block numbers aren't particularly good. That would be lazy analysis. Some of his defensive metrics are decent, but I think his lack of defensive rebounding and defensive playmaking suggests he may have minimal impact in these areas at the next level.

And this matters for wing prospects! There have been a couple of wing prospects over the years with similar rebounding and defensive concerns, like Jaylen Brown (16.5% DREB%, 1.7% STL%, 2.2% BLK%) and De'Andre Hunter (13.9% DREB%, 1.4% STL%, 2.5%). Thankfully, Dybantsa is much better offensively than both of these guys as prospects, so he can overcome this, but it raises some big questions about his ideal role in the NBA.

My biggest concern with Dybantsa as a prospect is that I don't know whether he will provide much value at all without the ball in his hands, and that's extremely concerning. He isn't a great three-point shooter, he creates much of his offense himself, and he isn't an active rebounder or defender. This puts a lot of pressure on him to be an elite interior scorer and playmaker. If he goes to the wrong team, this could become a massive issue.

Even with these concerns in mind, I'm still a big fan of Dybantsa as a prospect, and I think he's worth taking at No. 1. I also think he could easily underperform his draft slot. The value of being able to play off-ball is significant, and Dybantsa can't do this. He's either running the show on offense or he's basically not on the floor. He needs to impact the game in more areas to maximize his skillset.